- Thread starter
- #1
Great to see this comparison head to head! There haven't been many comparisons of the two that are this detailed, and they're vehicles that are very squarely aimed at each other.
Sponsored
								
									Last edited: 
								
							
						
						
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
					Yup! The Subaru is irrelevant because it looks so darn homely/fugly. It was never ever even in the conversation for me.the forester is fugly, so bronco wins .
Same.Ill never own another subaru again
What’s with the shopping links from Croatia embedded in your reply quote? They’re not in @kenmitch ’s post.That's the most hilariously specific rating system I've ever seen!
We won on fun to drive and off-road ability. For the life of me I'll never understand the value of a CVT. It's a cop out to get better mileage over good tuning and performance.
Great to see this comparison head to head! There haven't been many comparisons of the two that are this detailed, and they're vehicles that are very squarely aimed at each other.
Most Subaru drivers don’t off road. A good number of BS drivers off road. That’s the difference. I just wish the BS was more modular for customizing.We won on fun to drive and off-road ability. For the life of me I'll never understand the value of a CVT. It's a cop out to get better mileage over good tuning and performance.
A different "L" word came to my mind when I think "Subaru."Sorry Subaru but everytime I see one I think there is a Librarian driving.
Loser?A different "L" word came to my mind when I think "Subaru."