Can you say what, if any, are the differences between using this device and switching to SPORT mode?
I believe SPORT mode does much the same thing, at least for the 2.0L. Did you ever try SPORT mode with yours? If so, can you note the difference between what you get with this product and using SPORT mode?
And lived to tell about it.?
Drove first time in some snow and mud
I understand what changing throttle response does, I'm just wondering if there's enough (any?) difference in the way this device changes throttle response and the way Ford did it via SPORT mode. I'm not suggesting this device is a waste of money. I mean I get why someone who likes SPORT mode would want one; you don't have to change drive mode every time you start up. I'm just curious about the way this vendor implemented changes to throttle response compared to the way Ford did.
This one may be controversial, but I finally pulled the trigger on a Pedal Commander. I've had it for a week now and I can say it makes a very noticeable difference. No more random hesitation in the gas pedal. I highly recommend it.
I guess I have not felt that random hesitation with my 2.0L at all 
I look at my speed odometer and say oh mine 
I did not feel like I was going 52 in a 40 
I'm ok with that and I guess that I never paid attention to it so your right with me not knowing and plus I'm getting older too so I don't hit that gas pedal as hard as I use too 
Drove first time in some snow and mud
Okay, you have covered what this does for throttle response. Can you compare what the Pedal Commander does to what Sport mode does? If not, that is fine. Everything you have described so far sounds very similar to what Sport mode does.
Do you like the Michelin tires? They look good.Installed Front and Rear Splash Guards.
I'm glad to hear someone putting a CAI on the Bronco Sport. I have put them on most all of my previous cars and loved it.My first - and likely only - engine performance modification.
Love it. Love how well the engine "breathes" now. Clearly opens up the intake. I'd put one of these on a V12 that I used to own, and it was unreal. The "swooooosh!" of the intake was so cool, and the performance improvement was amazing. On this 2.0L, it's not all that, at all. You can hear the intake, but it's not loud. But it does deliver a handful of additional horsepower, which I was after, because of the bigger tires I've got on it. The additional ponies more than compensate for the added weight, and this thing runs!
Just want to share the video that really convinced me that K&N (or any oiled) filters are not what I want to use on my turbo vehicle.My first - and likely only - engine performance modification.
Love it. Love how well the engine "breathes" now. Clearly opens up the intake. I'd put one of these on a V12 that I used to own, and it was unreal. The "swooooosh!" of the intake was so cool, and the performance improvement was amazing. On this 2.0L, it's not all that, at all. You can hear the intake, but it's not loud. But it does deliver a handful of additional horsepower, which I was after, because of the bigger tires I've got on it. The additional ponies more than compensate for the added weight, and this thing runs!
I just played that full video, and can’t connect the dots between your recommendation for using a paper filter versus the point this gentleman makes about K&N. His point is that there is nothing that performs like a K&N for both flow and filter. That if you want peak performance, K&N is the way to go, and he explains the science behind that position. He makes it very clear that the only test where the K&N does poorly is in a static environment, meaning, a test that mimics the absence of an engine. But put a K&N on an engine with actual vibration, and the K&N filter is the best on the market.
