Where did you get this bit of info from? I have never heard that.
I was confused off what you said earlier then. They aren't "doing the tunes for FP". That makes it sound to me like Livernois was actually writing the tune. FP is using the Livernois tuning device to deliver the tune that FP engineers write. I get it now. It wasn't always like that. I think this started just a few years back. I knew procal had new tuning devices, but didn't realize they were the LIvernois tuner. I imagine it was in response to the HORRIBLE procal app that you would have to run on your laptop, that would take upwards of 30 MINUTES! to load your tune.When you get the Ford ProCal tool, the calibration says right on the tool that its from Livernois. I have the 2018+ Ford Power Pack on my 2020 Mustang and the ProCal tool says Livernois Motorsports.
I completely agree WRT 87 being the minimum. While 87 is fine, we use 93. If we drove a lot (like we used to) we might switch to 87.If they do they risk voiding their car's warranty. In the section on fuel quality, my owner's manual says:
"Regular" is a label, not an octane rating. 87 octane is the minimum you should use for your Bronco Sport.
Regarding power curves, the main reason horsepower drops off at higher RPM on these EcoBoost engines is because the turbocharger is sized to minimize turbo lag. Reduced turbo lag equals improved driveability. That's how Ford made a lowly 2.0L 4 cyl engine feel like a larger 6 cyl engine. To get that better driveability requires a smaller diameter turbine wheel to reduce weight and spool-up time. But the tradeoff is reduced airflow at higher RPM.
You can get more ultimate power at higher RPMs with these engines, but you'll have to swap to a larger turbocharger and be willing to live with the consequent turbo lag.
I lived in CA a long time and can appreciate that completely…Just noticed. The 5Star tune isn't CARB approved. That alone right there is a disqualifier for me.
Agreed, also with the new S650 Mustang coming out. The amount of tuners will be extremely narrow, as you will probably have to partner with Ford as the new ECUs are locked and Ford has the ability to access any modifications done to the car, talk about big brother.I lived in CA a long time and can appreciate that completely…
I think it is getting much harder to get CARB EOs as a smaller business.
In a way, I understand. If you modify the software and blow up the engine I think it's scummy to ask Ford to pay for it. Spend some time on enthusiast forums and you'll hear much discussion about how to remove all traces of a modification before taking your car in for service.Ford as the new ECUs are locked and Ford has the ability to access any modifications done to the car, talk about big brother.
The day I tune either of my cars is the day I assume 100% responsibility if I send a rod through my block. I have a vehicle service contract till 2027 or 125k miles on my RS, she is staying bone stock. I will also get one for the BS when I get closer to the end of the factory 3/36.In a way, I understand. If you modify the software and blow up the engine I think it's scummy to ask Ford to pay for it. Spend some time on enthusiast forums and you'll hear much discussion about how to remove all traces of a modification before taking your car in for service.
I'm all for folks modifying their cars if they want to. I just don't think Ford should pay when someone's "engineering" efforts end in catastrophe.
I was gonna suggest you trade for a Badlands, but that kind of disease is not cured by more power...I want the one for the 1.5 so bad but I know that the way I drive I'd blow something up and end up regretting it. I probably need the computer limiting my insanity from time to time.
Needless to say, the safest thing is to leave it stock. That said, if the tune is conservative, and proven -- many owners have used it over a long period of time without trouble -- it should be fine.I want the one for the 1.5 so bad but I know that the way I drive I'd blow something up and end up regretting it. I probably need the computer limiting my insanity from time to time.
I waited until the powertrain warranty expired on the WRX. In hindsight I wish I'd gone to Stage 2 immediately, because it was/is such a big improvement. At the time however, I didn't feel that the tune was sufficiently 'proven' -- but I'm not a gambler. Many people did it while under warranty.I've been watching this thread closely. It's peaked my interest to say the least. Mark does make some good points though. Maybe once it's closer to paid off or closer to my warranty expiring
The 1.5L is more than adequate. A possible exception might be towing the full GCWR (incl. 2,000 lb. trailer) up steep grades. Even then, see the info I posted about our RV -- even at over 11,000 lbs. it still manages to climb 6-7% grades on interstates at 50+ mph (in 3rd gear, floored...).I know this 1.5 isn't "fast". But I love driving it and I have fun. I was telling my buddy the other day the only races I win are the ones where the other guy didn't know we were racing and didn't try.![]()
"It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got."I know this 1.5 isn't "fast". But I love driving it and I have fun. I was telling my buddy the other day the only races I win are the ones where the other guy didn't know we were racing and didn't try.![]()
In a way, I understand. If you modify the software and blow up the engine I think it's scummy to ask Ford to pay for it. Spend some time on enthusiast forums and you'll hear much discussion about how to remove all traces of a modification before taking your car in for service.
I'm all for folks modifying their cars if they want to. I just don't think Ford should pay when someone's "engineering" efforts end in catastrophe.