These lists are unhelpful but easy to produce in order to move magazines or get clicks. Without a 'buyer persona,' why even compare a CX-5 to a Bronco Sport? As someone who test drove almost half those vehicles over the past year, the article in question would not have helped my research or influenced my decision.
Yeah, now its hey lets put the super boring yawn yawn jelly bean SUVs at top of the list. No mention of Bronco Sports getting unloaded from car carriers with lines of buyers waiting to buy every unit Ford can make.
And as I often would be, I agree with your sentiments...good...hey everyone look at the pretty jellybeans consumer reports said this is the best soccer utility vehicle out there...buy a Subaru!!. Save the boring broncos for those outcasts.
i would kill for that jawlineOff topic i know bit what the crap is wrong with this chick’s face? Do you want me never to use this product?
I totally agree. I used to be a loyal subscriber many years ago. I tried a subscription a couple of years ago and the magazine is nothing like it used to be. They do not even come close to the rigorous testing they used to do.
Yeah to a point it is, but perhaps they tried to compare apples to apples and the Big Bend was as close to the competition as possible with the badlands/first editions out of their league? I'm purely speculating.
There are enough differences from Outer Banks vs Badlands that it's almost like comparing a F150 to a Tremor or even an almost Raptor.
You are wrong. They raise their money. They accept no advertising. Their critiques have helped improve cars over the decades. I agree they are not spot on with the Bronco Sport. I have no noticeable vibration at 1500 rpm they mention. They also come at the Sport from a different perspective than an owner. Everything in this form doesn't apply to everyone. But it can help understand our Sports.
