Petes

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Petes
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
60
Reaction score
119
Location
Southern California
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Cherokee Limited
Autoblog’s BS Badlands road test

2021 Ford Bronco Sport Badlands Road Test | The best version on pavement, too
The competitive pricing and equipment make it really appealing

In the 2021 Ford Bronco Sport range, the Badlands is marketed as the off-road specialist. To back that up, it includes an array of off-road-oriented features. As it turns out, though, some of those features also make it the most entertaining version on the street. Add in ample convenience features and competitive pricing, and you have the best Bronco Sport and a serious competitor among rugged, entry-level crossovers.

Distinguishing the Badlands from other Bronco Sports are the mechanical upgrades. Under the hood is a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder that makes 250 horsepower and 277 pound-feet of torque (on premium fuel). Those are increases of 69 hp and 87 lb-ft over other Bronco Sport models. It’s coupled to an eight-speed automatic sending power to all four wheels, but it gets a torque-vectoring dual-clutch rear differential. And in addition to providing torque vectoring, it, and the center differential, can be locked for extra traction. The transmission and rear diff get their own oil coolers, too. The Badlands comes standard with 28.5-inch all-terrain tires as standard, with 29-inch tires as an option. The Badlands also gets off-road-tuned suspension with hydraulic bump stops, skid plates, unique Mud and Rock Crawl drive modes (aka G.O.A.T modes), a front-mounted camera, as well as Ford’s off-road cruise control system called Trail Control.

We’ve previously spent some time with the Badlands off-road, where its trail tools performed admirably. This time, we were able to try it out in its real natural habitat, city streets and freeways, and it more than makes a case for itself here, too. The engine is a sweetheart. Not only does it deliver every bit of its rated output, it does so over a fat power band, making it quick in nearly any situation. Then there’s that trick rear axle. While not the same as what was found in the dearly departed Ford Focus RS, it operates in a similar manner: on either side of the differential is a clutch that can engage or disengage an axle to send power to the wheel where it’s most needed (torque-vectoring). And in sport mode, the torque-vectoring tuning is adjusted, and even more of the engine's torque is sent rearward. This seriously changes the character of the Bronco Sport, making it more neutral and willing to power through corners. In the default mode, or in the regular 1.5-liter-equipped Bronco Sport that has a more conventional, non-torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system, there’s more natural tendency toward understeer. We’d love to see Ford make this all-wheel-drive system available in something like an Escape ST.

Bronco_Sport_Exterior_081.jpg


Not all of these changes necessarily improve the on-road experience, but they don’t really detract from it either. The off-road-tuned suspension can be a little busy and bumpy over mildly rough pavement, something we noted with a non-Badlands Bronco Sport. It does breeze through big potholes, though. There’s some mild-to-moderate body roll, due in part to the crossover’s tall stature. Still, it’s quite responsive and maneuverable. The all-terrain tires also had more than adequate grip and are surprisingly quiet, maintaining the well-isolated cabin's serenity.

If there's one area that could use improvement, it’s the slow-shifting automatic transmission – be it left to its own devices or, worse, when prodded by the driver in manual mode. Fortunately, it's smooth enough and the transmission computer has a good shift logic, so it doesn’t shift too often and doesn’t have to go through multiple cogs to get to the one it wants.

While the Badlands’ mechanical bits are its main draw, it also receives some nice interior upgrades. Dark blue or orange upholstery replaces the plain black or gray found in entry-level models, and an equally attractive brown leather upholstery is an option. Those colors are mirrored on plastic trim in the doors and dash, which brighten up the otherwise dull interior and distract from some of the cheaper hard plastics on display. Ford also offers an optional brown and black leather and faux suede that’s even fancier. Regardless of upholstery, the front seats feature heating and multiple ways to adjust them, with the driver getting power adjustment. Automatic climate control is standard, with dual-zone as an option.

The Badlands comes standard with the same 8-inch infotainment system as every Bronco Sport along with also-standard Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and four USB ports. The touchscreen is bright, sharp and responsive, and located where it’s easy to read and reach. The instrument panel relies on traditional analog gauges bolstered by a 6.5-inch central display. It features eye-catching graphics, which is generally a good thing, but when selecting drive/GOAT modes, it takes forever for the system to cycle through the special mode-specific animation. The lag time between turning the mode dial and its confirmation onscreen is far too long, though also an issue we've found in other Fords.

Bronco_Sport_Interior_031.jpg


It doesn’t miss out on too much compared to the nearly identically priced, but far less powerful, Outer Banks trim level. The ostensibly more plush Outer Banks includes dual-zone automatic climate control, auto-dimming rearview mirror, ambient lighting, leather-trimmed seats, a heated steering wheel, remote start, and rain-sensing wipers. Most of these features are available on the Badlands with the addition of the $2,595 Badlands Package. But even without that, we’d take the Badlands over the Outer Banks for the much improved driving experience.

Besides being an attractive package compared to other trim levels, the Bronco Sport Badlands is a highly competitive rugged crossover. Not that it's easy to identify obvious apples-to-apples competitors. It's roomier than Jeep's Renegadeand Compass Trailhawk models, and offers more power and better handling while featuring at least as much off-road capability. It's also pricier ($4,000 more than Renegade; $2,000 more than Compass). Above it in size and price are the Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, Subaru Outback XT and Toyota RAV4 TRD Off-Road, but their powertrains hardly align and the latter pair are hardly rock crawlers.

Of course, the Bronco Sport, particularly the Badlands, has broad enough appeal that it can easily be considered by those who have no intention of ever going off-road. So, if you’re simply in the market for a stylish, capable little crossover, you owe it to yourself to check out the Bronco Sport, and in particular the Badlands. Sure, it will get you surprisingly far off-road, but it will also keep you quite entertained on the road, all at a reasonable price.



Advertisement



 

tRex

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
186
Reaction score
90
Location
Rochester, NY
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
I think we've heard here the OB also gets a wiper park area de-icer that works when the rear defogger is switched 'on.' The article mentions a 'center differential' I don't think the Sport actually has? IOW I'm thinking the drive shaft to the rear spins all the time, with the computer engaging the rear, possibly 1 clutch, the other, or both if equipped that way, and depending upon the driving mode engaged (and driving dynamics) at the moment? Alternatively, there may be a PTO up front that drives the shaft to the rear -- or not -- under computer control (or when 4WD lock or other corresponding drive mode is selected on the BL/FE).
 

tRex

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
186
Reaction score
90
Location
Rochester, NY
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
I think we've heard here the OB also gets a wiper park area de-icer that works when the rear defogger is switched 'on.' The article mentions a 'center differential' I don't think the Sport actually has? IOW I'm thinking the drive shaft to the rear spins all the time, with the computer engaging the rear, possibly 1 clutch, the other, or both if equipped that way, and depending upon the driving mode engaged (and driving dynamics) at the moment? Alternatively, there may be a PTO up front that drives the shaft to the rear -- or not -- under computer control (or when 4WD lock or other corresponding drive mode is selected on the BL/FE).
...which, brings to THREE features the OB gets that AFAIK the BL, w/BL pkg added, does not -- 1.) the front wiper de-icer, 2.) rain-sensing wipers, and 3.) ambient lighting. I guess BL owners are too rugged to be expected to appreciate fancy interior lighting, or the conveniences of advanced front wiper operation!
 

tombstone81

Badlands
Active Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Messages
25
Reaction score
43
Location
Calgary, AB
Vehicle(s)
2009 Ford Flex, 2021 Mazda CX-9
Ambient lighting would've been nice on BL. Oh well.
Yeah it makes no sense to me. Just because I want the additional 4WD capability for my time on mountain trails...doesn't mean I don't want all the creature comforts associated with the 90% of driving I'm going to do in the urban jungle!

Ford dropped the ball on that one, and a fully loaded Badlands should be the absolute cream of the crop with every possible feature available. Period. Why punish me for wanting skid plates and a 2.0 engine by denying me a few desirable perqs? Oh well, I've had 12 years of cool ambient lighting in my Flex, I can definitely live without it on the BL, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a 2022 Badlands come out with all the bells and whistles, assuming Ford Marketing is listening to these chats.
 

Speed Devil

Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
Location
Jersey
Vehicle(s)
'21 Bronco Badlands, 19 Ram Rebel
Doesnt Ford sell Ambient lighting as an OEM Accessory?

Sucks it has to be retrofitted, but hey, could be worse, right? At least if not Ford, any shop that does audio and lighting can do it, make it any crazy color and dance with the music if you're into that
 

Washburn

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Messages
225
Reaction score
198
Location
NC USA
Vehicle(s)
2010 Ford Escape Limited AWD / 2005 BMW 330Ci ZHP / 2014 Mazda6 Touring
Hopefully the lag between GOAT modes (or the lag in display, rather) will be fixed with an OTA update for next model year...

The wiper park de-icer thing not being on BL is plain stupid, which IMO is more of an OFF road feature than ON road. Simplified, the OB is more apt to be parked in garages and the BL parked outdoors in the freezing cold.

Ambient lighting i couldn't care less about - My 2010 Boxy Escape has it, and it's just a gimmick... hardly use it. (matter of preference, I know)

Rain sensing wipers NOT on BL even with BL package? That's also stupid - again, it's something that will used in inclement weather, which the BL is supposed to be, just as often as if not more often than the "plush" OB.
However, this omission I can live with really, it's just another sensor that can break, and makes windshield replacements more complex. And most of the time, I keep adjusting it to my taste anyway. My BMW and wife's Mazda6 both have it, IDK if it ever works with 100% accuracy.

All in all, I have a feeling the 2022 BL+BL will include quite a few features missing from 2021.
 
Last edited:

tRex

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
186
Reaction score
90
Location
Rochester, NY
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
Regarding the ambient lighting, and 'advanced' wiper features on the OB -- I'm sure Ford wanted to differentiate the OB with these perks, as the "luxury" trim -- versus simply making it "second best" to the BL. With this understanding (correct or not), I'm surprised the BL has as much "luxury" as it does. I might have positioned the BL *lower* than the OB, and given the OB the 2.0L engine as well -- but still include the "off-road" specific features on the BL. So then we'd all be clamoring for the OB trim to get all of that luxury, and making tire, wheel, and suspension mods, and adding skid plates to that instead of the BL! As it is, I'm quite pleased with everything the BL+BL includes and wouldn't have it the other way around. WELL worth missing out on "ambient lighting" (is this anything more than footwell lighting here?).
 

Washburn

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Messages
225
Reaction score
198
Location
NC USA
Vehicle(s)
2010 Ford Escape Limited AWD / 2005 BMW 330Ci ZHP / 2014 Mazda6 Touring
WELL worth missing out on "ambient lighting" (is this anything more than footwell lighting here?).
It lights weird areas like the middle console and the cup holder surrounds. totally gimmicky. and most color choices are ghastly. (at least in my 2010 Escape - i am sure it's pretty similar). It's a far cry from ambient lighting that's in a Volvo or a BMW, which actually is very tastefully done, and doesn't feel gimmicky.
 
Last edited:

tRex

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
186
Reaction score
90
Location
Rochester, NY
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
Hopefully the lag between GOAT modes (or the lag in display, rather) will be fixed with an OTA update for next model year...

The wiper park de-icer thing not being on BL is plain stupid, which IMO is more of an OFF road feature than ON road. Simplified, the OB is more apt to be parked in garages and the BL parked outdoors in the freezing cold.

Ambient lighting i couldn't care less about - My 2010 Boxy Escape has it, and it's just a gimmick... hardly use it. (matter of preference, I know)

Rain sensing wipers NOT on BL even with BL package? That's also stupid - again, it's something that will used in inclement weather, which the BL is supposed to be, just as often as if not more often than the "plush" OB.
However, this omission I can live with really, it's just another sensor that can break, and makes windshield replacements more complex. And most of the time, I keep adjusting it to my taste anyway. My BMW and wife's Mazda6 both have it, IDK if it ever works with 100% accuracy.

All in all, I have a feeling the 2022 BL+BL will include quite a few features missing from 2021.
I had wiper park de-icer on my old BASE with family value pkg (or whatever it was called) 3G Dodge regular (not 'Grand') Caravan -- you could see the de-icer lines under the wipers. Never in my several decades ever had it on any other vehicle, near-luxury or otherwise. It is weird, and Ford is not alone, how they DE-CONTENT different trim levels to separate them, when and where many times it would be about as cost-effective or more to just include the feature in most or all of the trim levels. Kind of cynical, actually. Who wouldn't actually rather pay for REAL differences at different trim levels?
 

Advertisement











 
Top