I considered all four of these vehicles and others (including the $40k+ 4Runner) before settling on the BS. I didn’t start with a fixed price. I started with a price range and an idea of capabilities I wanted then looked at all the pros and cons including price. I’d say it’s perfectly reasonable to compare different priced cars. That’s how we decide what we are willing to spend for certain features.renegade trailhawk msrp is 28,945
compass trailhawk msrp is 31,060
bronco sport BL msrp is 32,820
cherokee trailhawk msrp is 35,595
why again is the bronco sport “supposed” to be compared/cross-shopped with the $4,000 cheaper capability mismatched renegade? And the cherokee not supposed to be cross-shopped with the $3,000 cheaper bronco sport that more closely matches the capability?
since we have determined that msrp price difference is close to all 3.. we have determined that dimensions are close between the 3. The hp, torque, 0-60, and mpg are very close between the cherokee and bronco sport.
It’s becoming clear that the bronco sport and cherokee are more closely related and with be cross-shopped just as much as the the others. The claim that the low range transfer case in the cherokee throws it into a completely different class of comparison is ridiculous. It’s hypocritical of car media outlets to compare the underperforming compass and renegade and not the closely comparing in capability/size/power/price cherokee.
Sponsored