- First Name
- Sherman
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2021
- Threads
- 30
- Messages
- 1,853
- Reaction score
- 1,936
- Location
- MIDDLETOWN, MD
- Vehicle(s)
- '22 Badlands ordered 12/17/2021 - Arrived 3/25/22
My wife and I also went from a RAV4 (1997) to a BS BL. We still have the RAV4 -- it still looks good and runs well. Even the A/C still works, but it finally developed enough problems that we decided to get the Badlands, rather than keep working on the RAV. It's a shame because it has the optional Torsen rear diff, which very few have.Interesting, thanks, very helpful. The door frame handles are sort of set into the ceiling above each door, and I can see there are 3, not sure about on the driver's side.
The Ford guy quoted me 48.6K, which is 2K over asking, and then came down $1K today, so 47 something. I think they are desperate, this being the end of the month.
I'm really mystified about that ground clearance thing. Once I air down the clearance would be below 8 inches, and I have a big center hump between the sand ruts. I think the bash plate could handle it but I'd rather clear it.
"I also plan to possibly die in this vehicle" made me BOL, yeah I guess I should probably plan the same. I hope they're durable. My Rav kept going forever even though I beat the hell out of it.
FWIW -- you might consider the cloth seats if they are an option. We have them and the upholstery seems to be a dense enough weave that sand would lay on top. If all that's available is leather, and if the perforations are large enough to be an issue, there are a lot of seat covers available (although it would be a shame to pay for leather and then cover it).
I think it's great that you actually measured the ground clearance!
That's something I would do (if I were in your situation). All I can say is your tape measure doesn't lie. IDK how Ford comes up with their measurements, but I would not put it past them (or any other mfr) to "exaggerate" a bit.
I know RV mfrs are famous for taking measurements that, while usually factual, are misleading. For example, "headroom" is measured from an unobstructed area of the ceiling (e.g., not from a low point like the A/C unit). "Width" does not include any trim, storage bins, awnings, etc.
Whether Ford plays games like that, IDK. For example, if they wanted to increase the ground clearance spec, they could measure it with the suspension unloaded. That would be a real stretch, but they could say that when the BS 'gets light' going over a rise, and the suspension is resting on the lower bump stops, the clearance is 8.8".
That said, it sounds like, money no object, you might be happier with a full-size Bronco. Of course, aside from the additional money there's the question of how much of your driving will be on rutted sand. In our case, we could not justify a Bronco (or other larger, more expensive SUV). Even if the extra cost was not an issue, we do almost all of our driving on pavement, so a Bronco would be serious overkill, and from what I've read they do not ride or handle particularly well -- not to mention much lower mpg. But still, if you do a lot of driving on sand, where clearance is a serious concern, maybe the Bronco (or similar) would be worth considering.
BTW -- I love the old video (8 mm?) of you driving the Jeep, it's great that you have that!
Sponsored
Last edited:

