Does 2.0L engine use cylinder deactivation like the 1.5?

BLUEOVALRACER

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Dec 22, 2023
Threads
12
Messages
976
Reaction score
1,102
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2023 Bronco Sport
Very old thread but, after reading that someone wouldn't even consider a 1.5t engine because of the mountains I had to say something. I drove a 1981 Chevette with a 75hp 1.6 liter engine. I went up mountains with it and its 3 speed automatic without a problem or pre-mature failure. I worried more about the brakes on that car then the engine. I have no problems with the 25 BB 1.5 T engine. Lots of power and gears to handle things. Would I take the 2.0 T if it were the same price, Yes Sir but the 1.5 T is still good.
It sucks You have to get the Badlands to get the 2.0 EB because it's a lot more money than the Big Bend. I had a Big Bend and had no problems with the 1.5 EB especially since I had the JMS Peddle Max which made a big difference IMO in throttle response and transmission downshifting . I no longer have the Bronco Sport I have a 2025 XLT AWD Maverick now with the 2.0 EB and it was cheaper than the 2023 Big Bend the Big Bend MSRP was $33,135.00 and the Maverick was only $31,510.00. IMO the Bronco Sports are over priced but the 2.0 EB should be an option in the Big Bends and Outer Banks although the 2.0 EB in the Big Bend would probably be close to $34-$35,000.00 which is still more than the XLT AWD Maverick with the 2.0 EB. FWIW i got rid of the Big Bend because of some issues with it[not engine or transmission related] and got Ford Employee Discount on the Maverick last year and I always had trucks before the Big Bend. I was able to haul 30 1.5 cubic feet bags of mulch in the Maverick last year with no problems.
Ford Bronco Sport Does 2.0L engine use cylinder deactivation like the 1.5? IMG_0578
Ford Bronco Sport Does 2.0L engine use cylinder deactivation like the 1.5? IMG_0718
 
Last edited:
 







Top