RonSwanson

First Edition
Well-Known Member
First Name
Ron
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
294
Reaction score
308
Location
Chicago
Vehicle(s)
2016 Fiesta ST, 2020 Edge ST, 2021 Bronco Sport First Edition
Quick video I made of my rental badlands vs my wife's Cherokee trailhawk.

That rental Badlands came with the aftermarket crossbars and rack?
 

Cabezone

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
292
Reaction score
291
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
Cherokee Trailhawk
How'd you go about renting it? This spring, after the snow melts, I'd be interesting in taking one up the trail that my old Crosstrek failed at.

Also since you've got both it'd be handy if you gave us your thoughts on how they compare.
 
OP
OP

DogBeer

First Edition
New Member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
4
Reaction score
11
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Grand Cherokee
How'd you go about renting it? This spring, after the snow melts, I'd be interesting in taking one up the trail that my old Crosstrek failed at.

Also since you've got both it'd be handy if you gave us your thoughts on how they compare.

I have a first edition on order, dealer got this in and its the Ford CT program so they can't sell until it gets 2000 demo miles on it. They said I could have it for 48 hours. I may switch to a BL+BL now because of the extra adaptive cruise control features and I really like the brown interior.

I'll give my thoughts on the comparison in a day or two cause I need to drive them right after each other.
 

Osco

Banned
Base
Banned
First Name
Marty
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Threads
31
Messages
1,805
Reaction score
3,121
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Bronco Sport and 2004 Ford Escape AWD
I have a first edition on order, dealer got this in and its the Ford CT program so they can't sell until it gets 2000 demo miles on it. They said I could have it for 48 hours.
Ok so you average 42 mph for 48 hours and It's yours, what's the prob ?
Roflmao
 


Osco

Banned
Base
Banned
First Name
Marty
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Threads
31
Messages
1,805
Reaction score
3,121
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Bronco Sport and 2004 Ford Escape AWD
My company bought one of those Dodge,,err as you were Jeep Cherokee's, They can keep it.
After one fifty mile trip I was done with that thing.
It felt cramped, didn't like the Transmission at all. The thing looked so dated, looked like all the rest.
Sitting the bronco Sport next to an older style chassis, smaller overall sport ute and doing a compare should help people realize the Baby Bronc Is a far better overall package.
 
Last edited:

Broncomaui

New Member
First Name
Maui
Joined
Mar 18, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Location
Albany, NY
Vehicle(s)
2012 Ford Escape
Really curious to hear how they compare. I’m torn between these two vehicles and feel the BS rides better but the Jeep has better towing capacity which I need.
 
OP
OP

DogBeer

First Edition
New Member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
4
Reaction score
11
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Grand Cherokee
I have also owned a 2015 Cherokee trailhawk so very familiar with them. just remember a lot of things with vehicles are subjective...…..


Engine: Bronco is peppy and smooth and definitely is a quick little beast. The Cherokee has the v6 and it does a great job but doesn't feel like anything special. Having test drove many 2.0 trailhawk's; the ford 2.0 wins hands down both with the in-cabin noise and performance. The Cherokee with the 2.0 feels like you're driving a car and fights with 9 speed and never feels settled.

Transmission: the update to the Cherokee 9 speed (gen 2) is night/day difference vs the old one however the Bronco 8 speed is still way better.

Off-road: They are both very capable off-road and the jeep has a better crawl ratio so I'd give a slight edge to the Cherokee with its 4x4 system. however, when driving both of more rough/slippery/higher incline surfaces the Cherokee really shined with its true 4wd system.

Exterior: I like both but the bronco wins hands-down

Interior: I like the materials used in the bronco on the dash and the brown suede/leather are awesome.... but, I like the inside door handles in the Cherokee better as it is a thick piece of aluminum vs the black plastic in the bronco. The Cherokee has more legroom for rear passengers but it has a tad longer wheel base.

The Cherokee you sit higher up and feel like you are in an SUV but, you don't have as much room over your head whereas the bronco 'I feel' you sit low in the vehicle almost car-like and have a lot of room above you. you feel a tad more cramped in the Cherokee and roomy in the bronco, on the road you feel higher up in the Cherokee.

Both vehicles are very impressive for their class.
 
Last edited:

Warren505

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Warren
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
134
Reaction score
63
Location
Trappe pa
Website
warren149.wordpress.com
Vehicle(s)
Ford
I have also owned a 2015 Cherokee trailhawk so very familiar with them. just remember a lot of things with vehicles are subjective...…..


Engine: Bronco is peppy and smooth and definitely is a quick little beast. The Cherokee has the v6 and it does a great job but doesn't feel like anything special. Having test drove many 2.0 trailhawk's; the ford 2.0 wins hands down both with the in-cabin noise and performance. The Cherokee with the 2.0 feels like you're driving a car and fights with 9 speed and never feels settled.

Transmission: the update to the Cherokee 9 speed (gen 2) is night/day difference vs the old one however the Bronco 8 speed is still way better.

Off-road: They are both very capable off-road and the jeep has a better crawl ratio so I'd give a slight edge to the Cherokee with its 4x4 system. however, when driving both of more rough/slippery/higher incline surfaces the Cherokee really shined with its true 4wd system.

Exterior: I like both but the bronco wins hands-down

Interior: I like the materials used in the bronco on the dash and the brown suede/leather are awesome.... but, I like the inside door handles in the Cherokee better as it is a thick piece of aluminum vs the black plastic in the bronco. The Cherokee has more legroom for rear passengers but it has a tad longer wheel base.

The Cherokee you sit higher up and feel like you are in an SUV but, you don't have as much room over your head whereas the bronco 'I feel' you sit low in the vehicle almost car-like and have a lot of room above you. you feel a tad more cramped in the Cherokee and roomy in the bronco, on the road you feel higher up in the Cherokee.

Both vehicles are very impressive for their class.
Thanks for the talk thru the differences. Nothing you said would make me want the jeep. It's just looks like any other vehicle on the road. If I'm going to spend almost $40k it had better look good and special!
 


KhanAdda

Badlands
Member
First Name
John B
Joined
Aug 1, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
7
Location
Vancouver BC Canada
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ford Escape
Really curious to hear how they compare. I’m torn between these two vehicles and feel the BS rides better but the Jeep has better towing capacity which I need.
To BS or not to BS... Cherokee Trailhawk is the question. For those who wondered about the Cherokee Trailhawk like the above poster and myself, here are my thoughts as an obsessed Bronco Sport Badlands+Badlands fan who has found compelling reasons to switch teams.

I just bought a Cherokee Trailhawk Elite (The latest - 2014-present - version of the Cherokee is known as a KL on the Cherokee forums) last Thursday (Aug 12, 2021). I traded in a 2019 Escape Titanium, which I really liked, but which lacked any off-road ability. I really wanted the Bronco Sport Badlands with the Badlands package (BL+BL), and placed an order for one in the beginning of May this year (2021). About 2 weeks ago I got a call from the dealership cancelling my order, after 3+ months of waiting, because no more 2021 BL+BL’s are going to be made. At this point the dealership doesn't know when Ford will be accepting orders for the 2022, but I was told it might March 2022 before one arrives. My previous order will be held and applied to 2022 BL+BL when Ford begins taking orders. I still haven’t cancelled my order yet in case the KL winds up being disappointing – it’s early, but so far it has not.

During my ongoing research of the BL I kept seeing comparisons of the BL and KL so, since the BL+BL is presently a ghost, I took a closer look at the KL. When I test drove the KL it seemed as okay as something can seem on a 1 test-hour drive (The sales guy had double booked me so he let me take it out a little longer than usual). I’ve now got just over 800km (500miles) on my new KL. I took it out on some great logging roads last weekend to test its abilities. Because I was really wanting – and looking forward to getting – the BL+BL, and did a lot of research on it over the past few months (hours on Youtube, forums, reviews, owner reviews, exploring the PDF manual, etc.) it’s still heavy on my mind, so I spent a lot of time comparing the KL and BL+BL – and also my traded in Escape, in my mind as I drove.

Observations:
  • 4-low: KL has it. BL does not. I think ford really missed the boat on this one. A lot of hard-core KL owners have taken swipes at the BL, saying that it’s not a real 4x4 because it does not have 4-low. I’ve been impressed with the BL’s abilities in Youtube videos so I really didn’t think 4-low would be a big deal but, after going up – and down – a few long, steep, loose-grade and rough logging roads with the KL, I found myself wondering how the BL would have handled it. Going up these hills the BL’s gear ratio would have forced the engine and drive train to work very hard. I’m not sure how manageable the BL would have been through the dips and rises going up the steep grade. With the KL on the other hand itwas easy – I simply shifted into 4-low then manually shifted gears with the real shift lever, and the KL crawled along with very little effort or strain. Yes, the BL’s is about 500lb lighter and has quite a bit more torque, but I’m not sure if that would have been enough to compensate for a lack of 4-low. 4-low made it easy going up that hill with the KL. And what about downhill? Is the gearing in 1st gear, and engine compression in the BL enough to keep from having to ride the brakes the whole way down in on the rough, loose-surfaced and steep logging road? Yes the BL has Trail Control, but so does the KL (Hill decent control and selec-speed). Trail Control can’t change the BL’s gearing, and the 2.0 is too small to provide any significant engine braking… and, Trail Control would have to make heavy use of the brakes. The BL’s liquid cooled PTU might help get it up the hill, even without 4-low, but I can’t imagine how the BL wouldn’t burn up the brakes going down this hill, even with Trail Control. In the KL I simply rode most of the hill down in 1st and 2nd gear in 4-low, using the brakes only as needed. Now that I’ve experienced the difference 4-low makes in the KL, I just can’t image how the BL could do the same road with as much ease. Just out of curiosity I may try that road again using 4-high to see how things work out. The only down side of this is that the rear locker only works in 4-low so it may not be a fair test.
  • Locking rear diff. I’m not sure if this is an advantage off-road over the dual clutch in the BL. I understand that that dual clutch system in the BL is pretty damned good, and that the BL’s AWD system is second to none (a Youtube roller-test video was impressive). Only off-road testing would show if there is an advantage either way between locking rear on the KL and the dual clutch on the BL, or if they are comparable.
  • Vented seats: KL has them, BL+BL does not – period. I’m in BC and we’ve had some serious heat-waves this summer. My test-drive KL had no vented seats and, even with the A/C on, the seats were quite hot on my back – enough for my back to be wet after a 1 hour drive. My KL Elite has vented seats, and I have to admit I like them a lot more than I thought I would. What a difference on a hot day, even with AC. Perhaps the BL will get this option down the road;
  • On-road. My only experience driving a BL-BL was for a 30min test drive on pavement, which included a short freeway run. I really liked the power and handling of the 2.0L in my 2019 Escape that I traded for the KL, so I think I would like the BL+BL engine and power as well. That said, I do find the KL to be a solid ride on the road. I’m still wearing in the engine on the KL so I haven’t driven it hard yet to see what it can do. I’ll push it harder after 1,600km (Yes I know there are 2 schools of thought on engine wear-in – I’m in the take-it-easy-at-the-beginning school). The KL’s combination of lower torque and additional weight of about 500lbs means it won’t handle or accelerate like a sports car, but so far the KL feels powerful enough, feels planted when driving, holds the road well and is better than expected in turns. I was really worried the about KL's road-worthiness after a fair amount of KL bashing that I’ve read, but my driving experience so far has been surprisingly enjoyable, especially considering I was pro BL+BL all the way, and not even considering the KL before my 2021 BL+BL order was cancelled. I don't think anyone should be concerned about how the KL performs or handles on-road. One thing: The KL has poorer fuel economy than the BL. The cost of this is partially compensated for by being able to use 87 octane without any loss of horsepower. BL needs 92+ to get its max horsepower. The downside for the KL is that it has the same fuel capacity as the BS so it won't go as far on a tank of gas - I think there is about an 80Km/50mile difference between KL and BS under ideal conditions. Fuel economy is not at its best during the engine wear-in so I'll get a better sense of this later. That said, I think a naturally aspirated non-direct injected engine, along with the additional off-roadie equipment that add the extra 500lbs to the KL may be a worthwhile trade-off. Still, I wish the KL had a bigger fuel tank to make up for the extra thirst.
  • Off-road: I was very impressed with how the Cherokee handled, especially with the 4-low and the locking diff. I was at one spot where the wheels were spinning so much, without the KL moving at all, that I thought I’d top-centered on a mound. When I checked, I found I had plenty of ground clearance, I just wasn’t gaining any traction on the steep, loose surface. I shifted the KL into 4-low and and it walked out like it was on dry pavement – enormous difference. Again, I think Ford really erred in not including a 4-low with the BL. The BL would be direct competition for the KL with 4-low. In fairness, while a lot of people are comparing the BL with the KL, my understanding is that Ford was aiming the BL squarely at the Compass, NOT the KL. The Compass also has no 4-low. I personally think the Compass was the wrong one to compete with since… does anyone really care about the compass as an off-road machine?
  • Under body protection: The KL protection seems quite comprehensive and confidence inspiring. I’m not confident with the thoroughness of the underbody protection of the BL, especially since the radiator is left completely vulnerable. And I don’t understand why the wheel-wells are lined with felt... for sound dampening? I noticed my Escape had the same thing, but I never took the escape off-road so it didn’t matter as much. The KL has a good old-fashioned hard, smooth wheel-well surface that will minimize stuff sticking to it. Makes sense if I ever happen to go through mud;
  • Interior: The KL Elite is beautifully finished. One of my favourite things is that there’s an actual shift lever on the console. The leather seats are beautiful, the dash leather with red stitching is tasteful and classy, there’s leather on the padded arm rest on the doors, the armrest console has tiered internal compartments to organize stuff (the pre 2020 escapes had this too, but for some reason Ford got rid of these and did not include them with the BS), there are 2 seat-position memory settings for the driver seat, which can be connected to a specific fob for automatic adjustment when getting in the vehicle. Even my 2019 Escape had the seat-position memory settings. I’m disappointed that the BL+BL doesn’t have seat-position memory settings at all. One plus with the Escape is that the rear headrests can be folded down for easy rear-seat folding. I think this is also the case on the BS. On the KL I have to either remove the headrests, or move the front seats forward (good thing I have seat-position memory) before I can fullyfold the rear seats down.
  • Console screen: I found the KL screen laggy at times. I don’t know if it’s not as good as the screen layout on the Escape - which is similar to the one on the BS (Though the BS's is bigger), or if I just have to get used to something different. The screen on the KL is smaller but not terrible. I’m still undecided about how I feel about the screen size and layout on the KL. I do think the BS’s screen is better. Also, I have to pay a subscription fee to use the phone app with the KL. Ford has made this free, so the BS will have this without a subscription.
  • Manufacturing: The KL is built in the US in Detroit, Michigan. BS is built in Mexico. I’m Canadian, but manufacture location still means something. I’m all for giving jobs to Americans for an American product (though I would not complain if it were built in Canada ;))
  • KL Elite cost (with dealer fees in) $46,761.35 + taxes (Canada). This is about $3,000 less than for the BL+BL that I may or may not see in March 2021.
My conclusion as someone who obsessed about, and looked forward to the BL+BL for months:

I think Ford sends a mixed message with the BL. First, they call it a Bronco (Sport), which implies some relatively serious off-roading chops. Ford highlights of the water-fording abilities, made the BL’s ground clearance 0.01” more than that of the KL, market the BL’s rugged off-road worthiness, tout the G.O.A.T modes, then pull back on the things that would really make it a truly capable off-roader. It’s a mixed message to brag about how rugged the BL is off road, then aim to compete with the Jeep Compass which, aside from being a Jeep, is not really that much of an an off-roader. Why give the BL so much capability, but then fall short with no 4-low and inadequate under-body protection? Ford may never have intended the BL to compete with the KL, but I think they should have since they came so close anyway before pulling back. Does anyone who really wants to go off-road really even consider the Compass? I still love the form-factor of the BS, and the AWD system on the BL is second to none but I think, overall – without a 4-low and comprehensive under-body protection, the BL went right up to the line of greatness then stopped before crossing it. If Ford had taken these two additinal steps, they’d have knocked it out of the park with the BL, and I would get the BL+BL in a heartbeat… if that heartbeat were to occur in March of 2022.

Now that I’ve had some time with the KL I've gained some perspective on the BL and I can see how close Ford came to making the BL a great off-roader. I’m very disappointed because I really wanted a BL, and I’m a little irked because I’m afraid that the KL may have ruined the BL for me or, more accurately, that Ford may have ruined the BL for me.

I think the BL is a very capable vehicle if you want it as a means to get to a particular destination, like a trail head or camping spot, but you have to go over some rough terrain to get there. On the other hand, if you actually like exploring, and rough terrain IS your destination, then I think the KL is the superior vehicle, especially if you also spend a lot of time on pavement and don’t want to go hard-core with a fully decked out beast like a Wrangler or the big Bronco. Both the BL and KL have their place, but I really don’t think that the BL can be fairly compared with the KL as the BL is presently built, no matter how good it’s AWD system is. To be fair, I don't think Ford ever intended it to be.
 
Last edited:

christopheru

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
457
Reaction score
603
Location
The Great White North
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport, Toyota Prius AWDe
Where is the switch to make the daytime running lights flash like that? ;)
On the off chance someone doesn’t know, all LED flicker. They do so at a high rate that most cannot detect. If the flicker and frame rate of a video camera are out of phase the right way, it is noticeable.
 

ChefDank

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Nick
Joined
Apr 3, 2021
Threads
25
Messages
478
Reaction score
615
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford Bronco Sport
To BS or not to BS... Cherokee Trailhawk is the question. For those who wondered about the Cherokee Trailhawk like the above poster and myself, here are my thoughts as an obsessed Bronco Sport Badlands+Badlands fan who has found compelling reasons to switch teams.

I just bought a Cherokee Trailhawk Elite (The latest - 2014-present - version of the Cherokee is known as a KL on the Cherokee forums) last Thursday (Aug 12, 2021). I traded in a 2019 Escape Titanium, which I really liked, but which lacked any off-road ability. I really wanted the Bronco Sport Badlands with the Badlands package (BL+BL), and placed an order for one in the beginning of May this year (2021). About 2 weeks ago I got a call from the dealership cancelling my order, after 3+ months of waiting, because no more 2021 BL+BL’s are going to be made. At this point the dealership doesn't know when Ford will be accepting orders for the 2022, but I was told it might March 2022 before one arrives. My previous order will be held and applied to 2022 BL+BL when Ford begins taking orders. I still haven’t cancelled my order yet in case the KL winds up being disappointing – it’s early, but so far it has not.

During my ongoing research of the BL I kept seeing comparisons of the BL and KL so, since the BL+BL is presently a ghost, I took a closer look at the KL. When I test drove the KL it seemed as okay as something can seem on a 1 test-hour drive (The sales guy had double booked me so he let me take it out a little longer than usual). I’ve now got just over 800km (500miles) on my new KL. I took it out on some great logging roads last weekend to test its abilities. Because I was really wanting – and looking forward to getting – the BL+BL, and did a lot of research on it over the past few months (hours on Youtube, forums, reviews, owner reviews, exploring the PDF manual, etc.) it’s still heavy on my mind, so I spent a lot of time comparing the KL and BL+BL – and also my traded in Escape, in my mind as I drove.

Observations:
  • 4-low: KL has it. BL does not. I think ford really missed the boat on this one. A lot of hard-core KL owners have taken swipes at the BL, saying that it’s not a real 4x4 because it does not have 4-low. I’ve been impressed with the BL’s abilities in Youtube videos so I really didn’t think 4-low would be a big deal but, after going up – and down – a few long, steep, loose-grade and rough logging roads with the KL, I found myself wondering how the BL would have handled it. Going up these hills the BL’s gear ratio would have forced the engine and drive train to work very hard. I’m not sure how manageable the BL would have been through the dips and rises going up the steep grade. With the KL on the other hand was was easy – I simply shifted into 4-low then manually shifted gears with the real shift lever, and the KL crawled along with very little effort or strain. Yes, the BL’s is about 500lb lighter and has quite a bit more torque, but I’m not sure if that would have been enough to compensate for a lack of 4-low. 4-low made it easy going up that hill with the KL. And what about downhill? Is the gearing in 1st gear, and engine compression in the BL enough to keep from having to ride the brakes the whole way down in on the rough, loose-surfaced and steep logging road? Yes the BL has Trail Control, but so does the KL (Hill decent control and selec-speed). Trail Control can’t change the BL’s gearing, and the 2.0 is too small to provide any significant engine braking… and, trail Control would have to make heavy use of the brakes. The BL’s liquid cooled PTU might help get it up the hill, even without 4-low, but I can’t imagine how the BL wouldn’t burn up the brakes going down this hill, even with Trail Control. In the KL I simply rode most of the hill down in 1st and 2nd gear in 4-low, using the brakes only as needed. Now that I’ve experienced the difference 4-low makes in the KL, I just can’t image how the BL could do the same road with as much ease. Just our of curiosity I may try that road again using 4-high to see how things work out. The only down side of this is that the rear locker only works in 4-low so it may not be a fair test.
  • Locking rear diff. I’m not sure if this is an advantage off-road over the dual clutch in the BL. I understand that that dual clutch system in the BL is pretty damned good, and that the BL’s AWD system is second to none (a Youtube roller-test video was impressive). Only off-road testing would show if there is an advantage either way between locking rear on the KL and the dual clutch on the BL, or if they are comparable.
  • Vented seats: KL has them, BL+BL does not – period. I’m in BC and we’ve had some serious heat-waves this summer. My test-drive KL had no vented seats and, even with the A/C on, the seats were quite hot on my back – enough for my back to be wet. My KL Elite has vented seats, and I have to admit I like them a lot more than I thought I would. What a difference on a hot day, even with AC. Perhaps the BL will get this option down the road;
  • On-road. My only experience driving the BL-BL was for a 30min test drive on pavement, which included a short freeway run. I really liked the power and handling of the 2.0L in my 2019 Escape that I traded for the KL, so I think I would like the BL+BL engine and power as well. I find the KL to be a solid ride on the road. I’m still wearing in the engine on the KL so I haven’t driven it hard yet to see what it can do. I’ll push it harder after 1,600km (Yes I know there are 2 schools of thought on engine wear-in – I’m in the take-it-easy-at-the-beginning school). The KL’s combination of lower torque and additional weight of about 500lbs means it won’t handle or accelerate like a sports car. So far the KL feels powerful enough, feels planted when driving, holds the road well and is better than expected in turns. I was really worried the KL's road-worthiness after a fair amount of KL bashing that I’ve read, but my driving experience so far has been surprisingly enjoyable, especially considering I was pro BL+BL all the way, and not even considering the KL before my 2021 BL+BL order was cancelled. I don't think anyone should be concerned about how the KL performs or handles on-road. One thing: The KL has poorer fuel economy than the BL. The cost of this is partially compensated being able to use 87 octane without any loss of horsepower. BL needs 92+ to get its max horsepower. The downside for the KL is that it has the same fuel capacity as the BS so it won't go as far on a tank of gas - I think there is about an 80Km/50mile difference between KL and BS under ideal conditions. Fuel economy is not at its best during the engine wear-in so I'll get a better sens of this later. That said, I think a naturally aspirated non-direct injected engine, along with the additional off-roadie equipment that add the extra 500lbs to the KL may be a worthwhile trade-off. Still, I wish the KL had a bigger fuel tank to make up for the extra thirst.
  • Off-road: I was very impressed with how the Cherokee handled, especially with the 4-low and the locking diff. I was at one spot where the wheels were spinning so much, without the KL moving at all, that I thought I’d top-centered on a mound. When I checked, I found I had plenty of ground clearance, I just wasn’t gaining any gaining traction on the steep, loose surface. I shifted the KL into 4-low and and it walked out like it was on dry pavement – enormous difference. Again, I think Ford really erred in not including a 4-low with the BL. The BL would be direct competition for the KL with 4-low. In fairness, while a lot of people are comparing the BL with the KL, my understanding is that Ford was aiming the BL squarely at the Compass, NOT the KL. The Compass also has no 4-low. I personally think the Compass was the wrong one to compete with since… does anyone really cares about the compass as an off-road machine?
  • Under body protection: The KL protection seems quite comprehensive and confidence inspiring. I’m not confident with the thoroughness of the underbody protection of the BL, especially since the radiator is left completely vulnerable. And I don’t understand why the wheel-wells are lined with felt... for sound dampening? I noticed my Escape had the same thing, but I never took the escape off-road so it didn’t matter as much. The KL has a good old-fashioned hard, smooth wheel-well surface that will minimize stuff sticking to it. Makes sense if I ever happen to go through mud;
  • Interior: The KL Elite is beautifully finished. One of my favourite things is that there’s an actual shift lever on the console. The leather seats are beautiful, the dash leather with red stitching is tasteful and classy, there’s leather on the padded arm rest on the doors, the armrest console has tiered internal compartments to organize stuff (the pre 2020 escapes had this too, but for some reason Ford got rid of these and did not include them with the BS), there are 2 seat-position memory settings for the driver seat, which can be connected to a specific fob for automatic adjustment when getting in the vehicle. Even my 2019 Escape had the seat-position memory settings. I’m disappointed that the BL+BL doesn’t have seat-position memory settings at all. One plus with the Escape is that the rear headrests can be folded down for easy rear-seat folding. I think this is also the case on the BS. On the KL I have to either remove the headrests, or move the front seats forward (good thing I have seat-position memory) before I can fold the rear seats down fully.
  • Console screen: I found the KL screen laggy at times. I don’t know if it’s not as good as the screen layout on the Escape - which is similar to the one on the BS (Though the BS's is bigger), or if I just have to get used to something different. The screen on the KL is smaller but not terrible. I’m still undecided about how I feel about the screen size and layout on the KL. I do think the BS’s screen is better. Also, I have to pay a subscription fee to use the phone app with the KL. Ford has made this free, so the BS will have this without a subscription.
  • Manufacturing: The KL is built in the US in Detroit, Michigan. BS is built in Mexico. I’m Canadian, but manufacture location still means something. I’m all for giving jobs to Americans for an American product (though I would not complain if it were built in Canada ;))
  • KL Elite cost (with dealer fees in) $46,761.35 + taxes (Canada). This is about $3,000 less than for the BL+BL that I may or may not see in March 2021.
My conclusion as someone who obsessed about, and looked forward to the BL+BL for months:

I think Ford sends a mixed message with the BL. First, they call it a Bronco (Sport), which implies some relatively serious off-roading chops. Ford highlights of the water-fording abilities, made the BL’s ground clearance 0.01” more than that of the KL, market the BL’s rugged off-road worthiness, tout the G.O.A.T modes, then pull back on the things that would really make it a truly capable off-roader. It’s a mixed message to brag about how rugged the BL is off road, then aim to compete with the Jeep Compass which, aside from being a Jeep, is not really that much of an an off-roader. Why give the BL so much capability, but then fall short with no 4-low and inadequate under-body protection? Ford may never have intended the BL to compete with the KL, but I think they should have since they came so close anyway before pulling back. Does anyone who wants to go off-road really even consider the Compass? I still love the form-factor of the BS, and the AWD system on the BL is second to none but I think, overall – without a 4-low and comprehensive under-body protection, the BL went right up to the line of greatness then stopped before crossing it. If Ford taken these two additinal steps, they’d have knocked it out of the park with the BL, and I would get the BL+BL in a heartbeat… if that heartbeat were to occur in March of 2022.

Now that I’ve had some time with the KL I've gained some perspective on the BL and I can see how close Ford came to making the BL a great off-roader. I’m very disappointed because I really wanted a BL, and I’m a little irked because I’m afraid that the KL may have ruined the BL for me or, more accurately, that Ford may have ruined the BL for me.

I think the BL is a very capable vehicle if you want it as a means to get to a particular destination, like a trail head or camping spot, but you have to go over some rough terrain to get there. On the other hand, if you actually like exploring, and rough terrain IS your destination, then I think the KL is the superiorvehicle, especially if you also spend a lot of time on pavement and don’t want to go hard-core with a fully decked out beast like a Wrangler or the big Bronco. Both the BL and KL have their place, but I really don’t think that the BL can be fairly compared with the KL as the BL is presently built, no matter how good it’s AWD system is. To be fair, Ford I don't think Ford everintended it to be. The KL has forced me to grudgingly manage my expectations of the BL. I wish I it wasn't so.
Very well written however since you have only driven a BL for 30 min and spent hours reading and watching vids about it I find your review quite bias. To each their own; but you can praise your KL that way ??? over on the jeep forum. I've ridden and drove a KL, my buddies got Wranglers and Willies stock and modified and I would still choose my BL. It has everything I need and then some and I'm not going to be rock crawling in it so I am good. Ford designed the BL to be a factory made off-road capable vehicle with upgraded features. Hence now I see EVERY car manufacturer coming out with an off-road version in commercials but lacking in the upgraded features. IMO the KL is underpowered, tight interior, and has no real WOW factor to me besides rear lockers (which only work on 4L so that sucks as well, my dual clutch engages all the time as soon as I lock it ?‍♂)I wanted best of both worlds. ?????
 

69cuda340s

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
2,316
Reaction score
3,242
Location
USA
Website
www.billsgarage.info
Vehicle(s)
"21 BS Badlands, '16 F150 Platinum FX4
Biggest drawback to BL is its limited availability. As soon as Ford can stock dealer lots with BL it will steam roll right over non-wrangler Jeep sales. Yes Ford needs to add features to BL (more under body protection, mem seats ect) but it first model year so I would expect improvements in later model years. So Jeep is getting off easy for now due to supply chain issues limited availability.
 

birddog2

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Keith
Joined
May 29, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
61
Reaction score
126
Location
Lewiston, Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2018 Honda CRV Bronco Sport Badlands
I found the review and comparison to be fair.
I have had on order a BL/BL since 18 March.
This is intended to be a replacement for my 2014 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk with 109,000 miles on it.

I ordered the BL/BL because I wanted something new and different than my last three Jeeps, not because I was dissatisfied with my Jeep.
I too wish that Ford had made a true 4x4 vehicle with a Low range and the ability to be towed behind a RV.

The Cherokee Trailhawk has been a good vehicle and will continue to meet my needs until Ford either decides to build the Bronco Sport I ordered five months ago or I am convinced that will not happen and I cancel my order.
So far, Ford has failed miserably to keep it's customers informed
Sponsored

 
 




Top