Search results

What I mean is doing it quickly while not being able to look at it about 20 times and never missing the right gear, this is pretty much only done to get out of a mud hole, but losing momentum by missing a gear can mean losing the shot of being able to get out under your own power.

for auto's I still prefer on the tree, but could live with the rotary thing. granted, it would be great if there was a way to make it quickly shift from reverse to drive and back over and over. That's one of those annoying things with an auto is trying to rock out of a mud hole and missing...

I do like the idea, provided I had a number of Broncos and money to burn. Could be a fun show or strip bronco.

Well, it is a rally car, and IFS tends to work best for that...don't think you'd see many arguments there. IFS better for high speed control, SFA for low speed technical and strength.

picture of it from a few years before my first picture. it was undergoing a paint job when it was up for sale in 2012-14.

I actually thought about buying that 73 about 8-9 years ago. I bought my Bronco instead. both of em had 460s in it. The mustang still pops up once in a while, not sure where it is now. I know it was housed in Des Moines for a few years, back when it was for sale around 2012. That...

guessing a wire for a sensor or data transmitter they have up on the roof or such.

Um, we were pretty sure but not completely sure it would be called the Mustang Mach E for a few months before it's release, along with a pretty solid idea of what it would look like. And that it was a 4 door electric CUV. Hell, the uproar over it being called Mach 1 was a year ago now.

I have an issue with the baby coming out before the Bronco Bronco, it'll muddy the waters for sure, even more than the Mustang Mach E. imagine if they cancelled the Mustang in say, 2018, then now come out with the Mustang Mach E, but the Mustang Mustang doesn't come back till 2022 or...

….Mustang Mach E....

That was my plan on a new mustang, have enough sitting in an investment account for the returns to be significantly more than the interest accruement on the loan instead of using that money for a larger down payment, would essentially result in a negative interest rate.

not sure, maybe. But that roofline is different than everything else we've seen of it, with the exception of a heavily camouflaged mule where they were hiding the roofline.

that is not an F-150 wheel. that is a ranger wheel, different bolt pattern. The stock tire on it is a 30" (stock Ranger XLT rim)

yeah I just went and did my own back of the napkin calc based off of some proportions and am getting a 28-30" tire as well, which would fit then with an approx. 105" wheelbase.

there has to be something wrong with your measurements, unless you are assuming that is a 29" tire on there? Edit: it is likely that the 17" measurement is wrong. 17 rim is on the inside of the lip, whereas the outside of the lip you measured should be between 17.5-18"

~101"

6x139.7 bolt circle. And those are 17" rims in that picture.

Eh, I think you should be expecting total lengths around 150-160 tops on the 2-door BroncoBronco, and 165-175 tops on the 4-door Broncobronco

I can say that I have very little interest in it, even though my commute sucks, can't say that I get enjoyment out of being stuck in traffic either. However, I also would consider myself not out of touch with where things are headed, even being nearly 40, being an engineer. and things ARE...