MKohlman

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
111
Reaction score
371
Location
Monterey, CA
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport Badlands, Fiesta ST
A while back I added a Curt receiver and trailer wiring to our Badlands as there had always been an intention to be able to do light towing with it. I posted about the wiring work back in October:

Trailer Wiring Install for Bronco Sport Using Factory Power Circuit (Part Two – Installation) | 2021+ Ford Bronco Sport Forum - Broncosportforum.com

The big motivation to get it all done before winter set in was that I accepted a new job in the Monterey CA area, which meant a 2,000+ mile move from the Midwest. After examining the options, the most cost-effective choice was to have our less-critical items shipped via container while the must-have stuff got hauled in our BS plus a U-Haul Trailer.

Based on the 2,200lb limit for the Badlands model, the largest trailer U-Haul will let you book is their 5x8 model, which has a 900lb empty weight and a 2,700lb GVW.

For the hitch mount I went with a Curt Class III mount with a 4”drop. For the 2” ball I decided to try the Curt 7,500lb Rockerball as I’d seen good reviews on its ability to reduce driveline shock when towing trailers with no trailer brakes. Since the Rockerball adds an inch to the overall hitch height, this worked out to an approximately 3” drop from the receiver height on the Badlands with the Curt unit. In addition, the ball mount was further secured with an anti-rattle clamp.

Amazon.com: CURT 45050 Class 3 Trailer Hitch Ball Mount, Fits 2-Inch Receiver, 7,500 lbs, 1-Inch Hole, 4-Inch Drop, 2-In Rise : Automotive

Amazon.com: CURT 40047 RockerBall Cushion Hitch Trailer Ball 7,500 lbs, 2-Inch Diameter, 1-Inch Shank : Automotive

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20220102_135351


That setup, once the trailer and BS were all loaded up, gave me an almost perfectly level pitch on the hitch. The Curt Rockerball was a pleasant surprise as it really does work as advertised, when combined with the anti-rattle clamp it reduced the jerking/shock through the driveline to an almost negligible level. I would highly recommend it.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211227_160127


My estimation is that there was probably about 1,000-1,200lbs loaded into the trailer (for an estimated GVW of 1,900-2,100lbs), with another 700-800lbs in the Badlands itself (wife, myself, English bulldog, misc. household items), so this was towards the high-end of what Ford would recommend for it.

If anyone was keeping tabs on the weather last week, we saw just about every road condition imaginable, from calm and flat (Missouri, Kansas, last part of California), to high-elevation, near blizzard conditions (I-70 trhough Glenwood Canyon and Loveland Pass), to 60+ mph winds (Colorado, Utah, Nevada) to rain (on and off throughout). FWIW our Badlands handled it all exceptionally well, with only a couple of brief nerve-racking moments during the descent on the west-side of the Continental Divide on I-70 when conditions were near-white out and there were a few inches of snow on the pavement. But even with a trailer hanging off the back in some really poor road conditions I never felt like the vehicle was over-extended. Indeed, with the GOAT mode set to slippery plus anti-sway and lane-keeping assist on, it was quite possibly the most poised vehicle I’ve driven while towing. In some ways it was almost too poised as I could see it encouraging someone to push it harder/faster than they probably should and getting bitten hard by physics if they weren’t careful.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211230_112040


Fuel mileage suffered big-time, which really should be no surprise, with a total trip average of 15.9 mpg, on generally 91 octane fuel. Similar to my Fiesta ST, the 2.0l EcoSport motor is very sensitive to the quality of gasoline, with best MPG and responsiveness using 91 octane with no added ethanol (which yielded something closer to 18mpg) to the one tank of 87 octane with 10% ethanol getting me only about 14 mpg. Being that thirsty though meant fuel stops around every 200 miles, so we saw a lot of travel plazas:

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211229_161718


Final numbers:

2,165.6 Miles from Springfield IL to Marina CA.

38.09 Hours trip time (with overnight stays, etc.… about 4 days overall)

56.9 average MPH.

15.9 average MPG

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211231_153152 (2)


Overall I’m delighted with the capability of our Badlands when it comes to towing and while I’m sure Ford had their reasons limiting it to just 2,200lbs, it is an incredibly competent and confidence-inspiring vehicle pretty much right up to that limit. Power from the 2.0l 4 was very good, ride and handling were excellent, and fuel mileage wasn’t horrible. Coming out of the experience I think the only thing I would have loved to have seen is a somewhat larger fuel tank as I could picture scenarios where pulling a camper into the back-woods with only a 200-225 mile tank range would make me want to make sure I was fully fueled before leaving civilization. Other than that, this thing can definitely tow.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211231_150907
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Escape2Bronco

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Oct 9, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
2,676
Reaction score
3,369
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle(s)
2013 Lexus, 2022 Bronco Sport, 2023 Heritage 2 dr
Thanks for the update. It will be a step down for me for towing as my last real tow vehicle was a 95 Lightning. It would tow a 6x12 dual wheel u-haul as if nothing was there.

But, how it handled the weather on the roads with the trailer is impressive. Glad you made it to CA safety.
 

Caliope

Outer Banks
Well-Known Member
First Name
Lisa
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
151
Reaction score
192
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2022 BS OBX, 2019 Ranger Lariat Screw
Congrats on starting a new chapter and for this first hand, real world account of the BS's capabilities. UI am sure you're not missing the brutal wind chills we are currently experiencing here in the Quad Cities (western IL/eastern IA) after the new year's day snow storm.
 
OP
OP
MKohlman

MKohlman

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
111
Reaction score
371
Location
Monterey, CA
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport Badlands, Fiesta ST
Thanks for the update. It will be a step down for me for towing as my last real tow vehicle was a 95 Lightning. It would tow a 6x12 dual wheel u-haul as if nothing was there.

But, how it handled the weather on the roads with the trailer is impressive. Glad you made it to CA safety.
I used the 6x12 U-Haul twice with a Honda Ridgeline (one my few non Fords over the years) so I know how you feel. The 5x8 worked for our needs but it was packed tight.

Other than playing around with the settings, this was really the first time I used one of the GOAT modes in a situation where it was possible to see a difference in having them. My wife and I were fortunate in traversing I70 on the one day last week that it wasn't plagued by closures, but they were still banning trucks without chains and I saw a lot of vehicle slide-offs. We took it easy of course, averaging about 30mph through the pass, but it was still impressive how composed the Badlands felt during the drive.
 

Mark S.

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Threads
101
Messages
5,294
Reaction score
9,940
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Badlands | 2020 Escape
Good review. My only quibble is I don't believe the use of 87 octane has any effect on fuel economy. The only way that would be possible is if there were more energy in premium fuel than in regular, and that's not the case. Premium's primary benefits are more margin against detonation and more peak horsepower--there are no efficiency gains.
 


VirtualJMills

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
260
Reaction score
277
Location
California, US
Vehicle(s)
2021 Bronco Sport
Good review. My only quibble is I don't believe the use of 87 octane has any effect on fuel economy. The only way that would be possible is if there were more energy in premium fuel than in regular, and that's not the case. Premium's primary benefits are more margin against detonation and more peak horsepower--there are no efficiency gains.
While you might not believe it, Michael (OP) specifically stated that it was an 87 Octane gasoline with 10% Ethanol, which means net-energy per kg will be lower compared to a non-ethanol-diluted gasoline, yielding reduced miles-travelled per gallon consumed (useful "work" per kg of fuel consumed) in a no-other-mitigating-circumstances(*) situation.

(*)Now, while the engine is operating under duress (Michael was towing a trailer in some hilly terrain, after-all), it's also possible that net fuel consumption could be higher (actual useful "work" per kg of fuel burned goes down) due to things like ignition retarding for predetonation reductions.

Does reduced Octane rating magically lower fuel mileage? No.

Are there circumstances where it might result in lower fuel mileage, as a consequence of either its formulation (Ethanol dilution) or external factors (engine load)? Yes.

Note: Not trying to be a dick here, simply pointing out that there were some mitigating circumstances. :)
 
OP
OP
MKohlman

MKohlman

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
111
Reaction score
371
Location
Monterey, CA
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport Badlands, Fiesta ST
Good review. My only quibble is I don't believe the use of 87 octane has any effect on fuel economy. The only way that would be possible is if there were more energy in premium fuel than in regular, and that's not the case. Premium's primary benefits are more margin against detonation and more peak horsepower--there are no efficiency gains.
This is something that I've seen come up on a number of forums with regards to Ford's EcoBoost engines. The reality is that given the rather sophisticated electronics in a lot of modern turbocharged, direct injected engines, many of them can take advantage of better fuel if they get it.

Is Premium Gas Worth It? We Test High Octane on 4 Popular Vehicles (caranddriver.com)

C&D did the test on the F150 V6 EcoBoost, but I've owned a Fiesta ST for about 7 years now and have personally seen the same things they observed with that engine with the 1.6L mill in the FiST. In driving our Badlands under normal conditions over the last year, the difference between 87 and 91 is far less dramatic (about 1 mpg and a just slightly detectible difference in responsiveness), but in a more stressed situation such as towing a couple of thousand pounds through mountainous terrain, the difference was definitely noticeable and measurable in observed MPG.

Another difference that doesn't get discussed as often is that ethanol-enhanced fuels have a lower specific energy than 100% petroleum gasoline. This will translate into somewhat lower fuel mileage as well.

During the run I was able to get 2 tanks of Shell 91 octane ethanol-free fuel. With both tanks responsiveness under load was improved and fuel mileage was about 1.5-2mpg better than 91 octane with 10% ethanol. Worst run was with a tank of generic 87 with 10% ethanol, which actually pulled the fuel mileage down enough to reduce the total trip average MPG from 16.7 MPG to 15.9 (over 2k miles) and it was noticeably less responsive under load.

Whether the higher cost of premium fuel is worth it (especially considering how much more it costs in some areas) is another question altogether and for around-town cruising our BS honestly gets Costco regular far more often than Shell Premium as the power and mpg hit isn't enough to matter. But in general an EcoBoost engine will take advantage of better fuels if it detects it.
 

Mark S.

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Threads
101
Messages
5,294
Reaction score
9,940
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Badlands | 2020 Escape
This is something that I've seen come up on a number of forums with regards to Ford's EcoBoost engines. The reality is that given the rather sophisticated electronics in a lot of modern turbocharged, direct injected engines, many of them can take advantage of better fuel if they get it.

Is Premium Gas Worth It? We Test High Octane on 4 Popular Vehicles (caranddriver.com)
None of the cars in that test achieved significantly better efficiency with premium fuel, and one actually saw reduced efficiency.

During the run I was able to get 2 tanks of Shell 91 octane ethanol-free fuel. With both tanks responsiveness under load was improved and fuel mileage was about 1.5-2mpg better than 91 octane with 10% ethanol. Worst run was with a tank of generic 87 with 10% ethanol, which actually pulled the fuel mileage down enough to reduce the total trip average MPG from 16.7 MPG to 15.9 (over 2k miles) and it was noticeably less responsive under load.
No doubt there is a difference between fuel with and without ethanol, mainly because ethanol has fewer BTUs per gallon than gasoline. But there is no significant difference in BTUs between premium with ethanol and regular with ethanol. I find it much more likely any mileage difference you noted between the two was due to other factors (grade, wind, road contamination, etc.). These are very boxy cars, and you were towing a boxy trailer with a large gap between. In this driving situation a small change in wind speed/direction at highway speed can make a very big difference in fuel mileage. Same goes for grade. Pulling weight up a mountain takes a lot more energy than cruising on a flat.

But in general an EcoBoost engine will take advantage of better fuels if it detects it.
Yes, by providing greater peak horsepower, not better efficiency. If it were possible to get better engine efficiency using premium fuel manufacturers would advertise it. So far, I have been unable to find any data-based article or study online showing better fuel efficiency with premium fuel. If anyone has a link I'd love to see one.
 

AllTerrain

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
S
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
190
Reaction score
143
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
A while back I added a Curt receiver and trailer wiring to our Badlands as there had always been an intention to be able to do light towing with it. I posted about the wiring work back in October:

Trailer Wiring Install for Bronco Sport Using Factory Power Circuit (Part Two – Installation) | 2021+ Ford Bronco Sport Forum - Broncosportforum.com

The big motivation to get it all done before winter set in was that I accepted a new job in the Monterey CA area, which meant a 2,000+ mile move from the Midwest. After examining the options, the most cost-effective choice was to have our less-critical items shipped via container while the must-have stuff got hauled in our BS plus a U-Haul Trailer.

Based on the 2,200lb limit for the Badlands model, the largest trailer U-Haul will let you book is their 5x8 model, which has a 900lb empty weight and a 2,700lb GVW.

For the hitch mount I went with a Curt Class III mount with a 4”drop. For the 2” ball I decided to try the Curt 7,500lb Rockerball as I’d seen good reviews on its ability to reduce driveline shock when towing trailers with no trailer brakes. Since the Rockerball adds an inch to the overall hitch height, this worked out to an approximately 3” drop from the receiver height on the Badlands with the Curt unit. In addition, the ball mount was further secured with an anti-rattle clamp.

Amazon.com: CURT 45050 Class 3 Trailer Hitch Ball Mount, Fits 2-Inch Receiver, 7,500 lbs, 1-Inch Hole, 4-Inch Drop, 2-In Rise : Automotive

Amazon.com: CURT 40047 RockerBall Cushion Hitch Trailer Ball 7,500 lbs, 2-Inch Diameter, 1-Inch Shank : Automotive

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20220102_135351


That setup, once the trailer and BS were all loaded up, gave me an almost perfectly level pitch on the hitch. The Curt Rockerball was a pleasant surprise as it really does work as advertised, when combined with the anti-rattle clamp it reduced the jerking/shock through the driveline to an almost negligible level. I would highly recommend it.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211227_160127


My estimation is that there was probably about 1,000-1,200lbs loaded into the trailer (for an estimated GVW of 1,900-2,100lbs), with another 700-800lbs in the Badlands itself (wife, myself, English bulldog, misc. household items), so this was towards the high-end of what Ford would recommend for it.

If anyone was keeping tabs on the weather last week, we saw just about every road condition imaginable, from calm and flat (Missouri, Kansas, last part of California), to high-elevation, near blizzard conditions (I-70 trhough Glenwood Canyon and Loveland Pass), to 60+ mph winds (Colorado, Utah, Nevada) to rain (on and off throughout). FWIW our Badlands handled it all exceptionally well, with only a couple of brief nerve-racking moments during the descent on the west-side of the Continental Divide on I-70 when conditions were near-white out and there were a few inches of snow on the pavement. But even with a trailer hanging off the back in some really poor road conditions I never felt like the vehicle was over-extended. Indeed, with the GOAT mode set to slippery plus anti-sway and lane-keeping assist on, it was quite possibly the most poised vehicle I’ve driven while towing. In some ways it was almost too poised as I could see it encouraging someone to push it harder/faster than they probably should and getting bitten hard by physics if they weren’t careful.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211230_112040


Fuel mileage suffered big-time, which really should be no surprise, with a total trip average of 15.9 mpg, on generally 91 octane fuel. Similar to my Fiesta ST, the 2.0l EcoSport motor is very sensitive to the quality of gasoline, with best MPG and responsiveness using 91 octane with no added ethanol (which yielded something closer to 18mpg) to the one tank of 87 octane with 10% ethanol getting me only about 14 mpg. Being that thirsty though meant fuel stops around every 200 miles, so we saw a lot of travel plazas:

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211229_161718


Final numbers:

2,165.6 Miles from Springfield IL to Marina CA.

38.09 Hours trip time (with overnight stays, etc.… about 4 days overall)

56.9 average MPH.

15.9 average MPG

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211231_153152 (2)


Overall I’m delighted with the capability of our Badlands when it comes to towing and while I’m sure Ford had their reasons limiting it to just 2,200lbs, it is an incredibly competent and confidence-inspiring vehicle pretty much right up to that limit. Power from the 2.0l 4 was very good, ride and handling were excellent, and fuel mileage wasn’t horrible. Coming out of the experience I think the only thing I would have loved to have seen is a somewhat larger fuel tank as I could picture scenarios where pulling a camper into the back-woods with only a 200-225 mile tank range would make me want to make sure I was fully fueled before leaving civilization. Other than that, this thing can definitely tow.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul 20211231_150907
This is very reassuring to read thank you for posting such detail. Good luck in your new home.
 
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Location
Bend, OR
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
I have the factory installed tow package and my receiver height is just under 17''. I want to tow the same Uhaul 5x8 trailer as you. What hitch would you recommend? Would it make a difference if I get the RockerBall or not?

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul IMG_1776
 


OP
OP
MKohlman

MKohlman

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Threads
6
Messages
111
Reaction score
371
Location
Monterey, CA
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport Badlands, Fiesta ST
I have the factory installed tow package and my receiver height is just under 17''. I want to tow the same Uhaul 5x8 trailer as you. What hitch would you recommend? Would it make a difference if I get the RockerBall or not?

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul IMG_1776
Looks like the factory hitch is less than an inch higher than the Curt hitch. Not really enough to make a difference.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul tsy0jpET-504713


I'd either use the same ball mount as I did (Curt 7.500lb with a 4" drop) or if you wanted just a tad more bias towards the receiver end you could go with a 6" drop. The Rockerball adds/subtracts an inch depending on whether you are using the ball mount to raise or lower the height. So a 4" drop ball mount with the Rockerball works out to a 3" real-world drop when it is installed.
 

Robins21

Big Bend
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
382
Reaction score
503
Location
Horse Pasture, Virginia
Vehicle(s)
21 Bronco Sport, 05 F150, 99 Explorer, 69 Stang
Thanks for the review. Once we get the hitch & wiring installed we will be doing towing from time to time pulling my wife's 2016 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom. We will see if it tows better then my 00 Ranger 4x4.
 
Last edited:
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Location
Bend, OR
Vehicle(s)
Bronco Sport
Looks like the factory hitch is less than an inch higher than the Curt hitch. Not really enough to make a difference.

Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul tsy0jpET-504713


I'd either use the same ball mount as I did (Curt 7.500lb with a 4" drop) or if you wanted just a tad more bias towards the receiver end you could go with a 6" drop. The Rockerball adds/subtracts an inch depending on whether you are using the ball mount to raise or lower the height. So a 4" drop ball mount with the Rockerball works out to a 3" real-world drop when it is installed.
Thank you MKohlman for the response. One thing I'm still stuck on is the calculation of the receiver drop. My understanding is you take the difference between top of the receiver tube and the coupler height and that is your rise/drop. I googled the coupler height and found that U-haul has a standard coupler height of 18'' (maybe that is wrong?) so for my calculation I was getting a rise of 1'' (17''-18''). Your setup looks level/correct so I must be missing something.
 

Mark S.

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Threads
101
Messages
5,294
Reaction score
9,940
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Badlands | 2020 Escape
Thank you MKohlman for the response. One thing I'm still stuck on is the calculation of the receiver drop. My understanding is you take the difference between top of the receiver tube and the coupler height and that is your rise/drop. I googled the coupler height and found that U-haul has a standard coupler height of 18'' (maybe that is wrong?) so for my calculation I was getting a rise of 1'' (17''-18''). Your setup looks level/correct so I must be missing something.
You may be making this harder than it needs to be. Drive over to your local U-haul place and they'll help you determine the hitch you need for whatever trailer you're going to haul. Alternatively, get an adjustable hitch (there are a variety available on Amazon).
 

Mark S.

Badlands
Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Threads
101
Messages
5,294
Reaction score
9,940
Location
St. Jacob, IL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Badlands | 2020 Escape
I forgot to mention, this is the one I use:
Ford Bronco Sport Hauling with and towing a U-Haul dc-9928c0131652_1.7f3d363abecff33ded1b07d2e452bf14


You can insert into the receiver with the vertical up or down, and the adjustable part may also be flipped (although you would need a wrench to flip the ball as well). It's relatively inexpensive compared to some of the choices, mainly because you only have a single ball size. But it provides a tremendous amount of adjustability on the height. Despite the height difference between the two vehicles, I can use this hitch on either my Badlands or the wife's Escape.

Here's a link to the hitch on Amazon.
Sponsored

 
 




Top