- Joined
- Dec 1, 2021
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 1,245
- Reaction score
- 1,052
- Location
- MIDDLETOWN, MD
- Vehicle(s)
- '22 Badlands ordered 12/17/2021 - Arrived 3/25/22
Good reply.It's precisely this kind of (intentional?) confusion that prompted passage of the Magnuson-Moss Act. Manufacturers are expressly forbidden from "tie-in" sales provisions that state or imply that a consumer must buy or use an item or service from a particular company to keep their warranty intact. The "specification" listed in the manual is a Ford specification, not an industry specification, and under the act Ford cannot require you to use it. This is why your owner's manual contains the following statement under the section titled, "Oil Capacity and Specication."
The highlighted section in the above quote defines the oil requirement for warranty purposes. If it's an API-certified 5W20 oil that meets API's SP standard then Ford cannot deny warranty coverage. Any attempt to do so by Ford would be a violation of Federal law.
I am as big a fan of Magnuson-Moss as anyone -- and my comments over the last year+ here show that I am hardly a Ford fanboy.
That said, it's possible that a mfr "spec" or certification that does *not* require the purchase of parts and/or supplies from a specific mfr or vendor may not be a violation of Magnuson-Moss.
For example, MB has an oil spec (229.51) for the oil used in our RV's Sprinter chassis. There are literally dozens of oil companies that make oil that meets MB 229.51 (several in the US, many others world-wide). None of them are associated with MB (AFAIK).
Anyway, that's an area that's unclear to me. It seems like as long as the owner has at least a few choices (unrelated to the vehicle mfr) that's probably legal.
Now, if it turned out that the Ford spec oil was only available from Ford dealers, then it would clearly be time for a smack-down.
One game that gets played is that oil companies must *pay* for certification from auto mfrs. Some simply decide it's not worth it. One oil mfr (Amalie) rep told me that they paid MB the fee for a few years, but had recently decided it wasn't worth it. It was the exact same oil, but because they did not cough up the money, they could not use the official wording -- like, "MB Approval 229.51" (or similar). Mfrs who do not pay MB, must use alternate wording, similar to, "Complies with MB 229.51".
In short, it gets pretty ridiculous.
Personally, if I can get Mobil 1 or some other synthetic that that meets API's SP standard *and* Ford's '961-A1', great. If not, I agree that any 5W30 oil that has API SP certification should satisfy the warranty requirements.
Sponsored