- First Name
- Dale
- Joined
- May 18, 2021
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 7
- Location
- Loveland Colorado
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Bronco Sport Badlands Iconic Silver
- Thread starter
- #1
Sponsored
Fair point; you want to avoid getting into such a situation in the first place if possible. But I wouldn't allow caution to trump logic.If there has been an oil change with different oil and that district manager sees any form of sludge or varnish he will deny the claim or only pay a portion of it. That puts the customer into the corner because once the DM says no there is no one else really to reach out to.
I agree that any oil may leave the same sludge or varnish it just leaves the manufacturer an opening to deny a warranty. I went on a field trip with GM to a refinery in Casper Wyoming. That is where Goodwrench motor oil was bottled at the time. As the bottles came down a conveyor and were filled the GM bottles were replaced by another brand being filled immediately. I quietly asked the guy on the tour if there was a difference in the oil between the 2 different bottles. He said no that they bottled for several companies that used a different detergent recipe but most all got the same formula. Not only that but we bought in bulk that was pumped into a 500-gallon tank. It was authorized by GM as Goodwrench oil but that same delivery truck delivered to some quick lubes and it got changed to whatever brand they were selling. It all came out of the same spicket.Fair point; you want to avoid getting into such a situation in the first place if possible. But I wouldn't allow caution to trump logic.
If you are using an oil that meets Ford's spec--a part of which specifies varnish and sludge production--and changing it per the recommended schedule, the likelihood of accumulating enough varnish or sludge in significant quantity to affect engine operation is vanishingly small, otherwise you'll get the same varnish and sludge no matter what kind of oil you use, including Motorcraft.
I'm not, nor have I ever been a service manager, so I can only go on what I read about online. The only cases I know where a manufacturer denied warranty coverage related to oil involved people running the engine without oil, using a grossly wrong grade or specification, not following the recommended service schedule, or simply never actually changing the oil (one case I recall the owner brought the car in for a warranty claim near the end of his warranty coverage and was still running on the factory oil!). Do you recall any cases where warranty was denied because the owner didn't use the recommended oil brand? This is specifically the kind of behavior the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act was meant to address.
Aside from the potential civil liabilities, the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act imposes significant fines on manufacturers that deny a warranty claim without a cause. In addition, the Act automatically awards attorney's fees to successful plaintiffs in civil cases. All this is to say there are strong incentives for manufacturers not to deny warranty coverage unless they have a good reason. I'm skeptical that a bit of varnish and sludge that might be present even if the recommended oil is used would pass muster.
Excellent video Colt/Dale. Very well done! That will reduce the number of times I have to slide out from under the Badlands.
I'm with you on this -- in fact I've posted similar comments about Magnuson-Moss over the decades.Good video. One correction:
You may confidently use any oil you like as long as it meets the spec called out in the Owner's Manual. For the 2.0L that's any 5W30 that conforms to the API SP standard. Ford cannot deny warranty coverage for not using Motorcraft oil--that's against the law. Which law? The Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act.
Sorry to say but Mobil 1 does not technically satisfy Ford's requirements. If I were you I would double check the specs on your Mobil 1 if you purchased it from Costco but even Mobil's own website will not recommend Mobil 1 for anything other than the 1.5L engine. Ford updated their oil spec requirements to help abate low speed preignition issues as well as to help with timing chain guide wear and many oils out there currently do not meet these specs. This is something people should keep in mind when doing their own oil changes.I'm with you on this -- in fact I've posted similar comments about Magnuson-Moss over the decades.
That said, Colt makes a good point, which is essentially, don't give them any ammo.
So here's where I do my best Reggie Watts impersonation (Late, Late Show band) -- "You're both absolutely correct!"
There is solid justification for either course of action -- exercise your rights under Magnuson-Moss and use any oil (and filter) you want (as long as they meet Ford's specs); or, try to preemptively reduce the chance of any hassles from the dealer/DM/Ford and use FoMoCo oil and filters.
Personally, I'm using the Motorcraft filter because a) it is said to be a quality filter and I have no solid preference anyway, b) they are reasonably priced, and c) in the extremely unlikely chance we have engine problems, it's one less thing they can use as an excuse to weasel out of honoring their warranty.
For oil, I'm living life on the edge and using Mobil 1. I've used it for years, it is not very expensive (esp when on sale at Costco), and it's cheap insurance. I have no doubt that Ford's synthetic blend is fine, but if it is like most 'blends' it is only around 20% synthetic. For the same amount of money it makes sense to go with 100% 5W30 synthetic.
Technically, it satisfies Ford's requirements, but if they really wanted to grasp at straws they could try to claim that Mobil 1 is not equivalent to their "special proprietary" blend.
Bottom line (just speaking for myself) I've used a variety of filters over the past 45+ years --even the dreaded Fram. I've used a variety of oils, starting with conventional oil (because synthetic was not readily available and/or too expensive) and for the past 30+ years, synthetic of various brands (mostly Mobil 1). I have never, not once, had any engine trouble related to the oil and/or filters -- that's over hundreds of thousands of miles, and often running the vehicles hard.
In short, while I've always been pretty OCD about oil changes, and I'm not about to stop now, in my (admittedly anecdotal) experience cars and trucks fall apart long before the engine goes. Every car I've gotten rid of had high miles and multiple problems, but they all still ran great and burned very little oil.
So I'm not worried about the engine in the Badlands blowing up, but I would not do something like using an unapproved viscosity oil (e.g. 10W30) that would give Ford any leverage -- in the very rare chance that something might happen.
Thanks for the heads up -- I'll check it out.Sorry to say but Mobil 1 does not technically satisfy Ford's requirements. If I were you I would double check the specs on your Mobil 1 if you purchased it from Costco but even Mobil's own website will not recommend Mobil 1 for anything other than the 1.5L engine. Ford updated their oil spec requirements to help abate low speed preignition issues as well as to help with timing chain guide wear and many oils out there currently do not meet these specs. This is something people should keep in mind when doing their own oil changes.
![]()
I believe only the extended performance meets Ford's spec for the 2.0 in your badlands. The normal Mobil 1 (the only type sold at Costco) does not meet that spec. I highlighted the specific spec straight out of your owner's manual. You need to look at the data sheet for whatever oil you choose or the bottle to make sure it meets that specific WSS requirementThere are 5 flavors of Mobil1 5W30 listed at the "Product Guide" link on this page that have the correct Ford service fill approval (xxx 961-A1):
https://www.mobil.com/en/lubricants/for-personal-vehicles/our-products/products/mobil-1-5w-30
It's precisely this kind of (intentional?) confusion that prompted passage of the Magnuson-Moss Act. Manufacturers are expressly forbidden from "tie-in" sales provisions that state or imply that a consumer must buy or use an item or service from a particular company to keep their warranty intact. The "specification" listed in the manual is a Ford specification, not an industry specification, and under the act Ford cannot require you to use it. This is why your owner's manual contains the following statement under the section titled, "Oil Capacity and Specication."Sorry to say but Mobil 1 does not technically satisfy Ford's requirements. If I were you I would double check the specs on your Mobil 1 if you purchased it from Costco but even Mobil's own website will not recommend Mobil 1 for anything other than the 1.5L engine. Ford updated their oil spec requirements to help abate low speed preignition issues as well as to help with timing chain guide wear and many oils out there currently do not meet these specs. This is something people should keep in mind when doing their own oil changes.
The highlighted section in the above quote defines the oil requirement for warranty purposes. If it's an API-certified 5W20 oil that meets API's SP standard then Ford cannot deny warranty coverage. Any attempt to do so by Ford would be a violation of Federal law.We recommend Motorcraft motor oil for your vehicle. If Motorcraft oil is not available, use motor oils of the recommended viscosity grade that meet API SP requirements and display the API Certification Mark for gasoline engines.
That's exactly what I did -- looked at the Mobil 1 data sheet, and found five types that meet the WSS requirement.I believe only the extended performance meets Ford's spec for the 2.0 in your badlands. The normal Mobil 1 (the only type sold at Costco) does not meet that spec. I highlighted the specific spec straight out of your owner's manual. You need to look at the data sheet for whatever oil you choose or the bottle to make sure it meets that specific WSS requirement